Comments on: DICE Takes Swap At Treyarch, Says Future Setting Is “Cheap” Way To Innovate

By: linglingjr

linglingjr — Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:01:55 +0000

I agree though if black ops 2 took place modern day, or any setting but the future I would buy just for zombies. But when I saw all the future trailers I instantly said “gay no way I’m buying this” it does feel cheap I mean imagine the weapons I look forward to seeing how the name them: X14324 LASER BLASTER lol

By: nick

nick — Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:05:07 +0000

wow dude congrats for proving exactly whats wrong with gaming journalism today!
he was not talking about COD, he was asked about how games have changed over the years and where he sees them going in the future, and also about how much say fans have in the developers work.
this is exactly why im seriously surprised developers have not turned around and said you know what?
fuck you im not doing any more interviews!
everything they say has to be misconstrued and twisted into something to sound bad about them!
totally sick of it!

By: benzo

benzo — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 16:47:15 +0000

I agree with Grim, but also with Dice too. The future setting is a bit on the stale side. Give us something new…similar to how Halo did with the xbox, like Gears did on 360, and Resistance with the ps3. New, exciting, and vibrant worlds.

By: TheGrimOfDeath

TheGrimOfDeath — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 16:11:15 +0000

Developers should just stop shelling at each other and start focusing at there own games. I mean BF3 Premium? DICE you’re fudged up. Also COD is at least trying to make something different, but I wish that there could be a FPS set in an alternate universe and they can explore that alternate universe.